Is direct evidence (e.g. a videotape; witness testimony that they saw you steal) strictly necessary? No, though it is clearly helpful. If you were the only person who had access to the missing money when it went missing, for example, that could be enough; or if the other people who had access all testify that the money is missing and they did not take and they are believable (and you are not), that may be enough, too.
They can't take the money from your pay without your consent or permission. They could sue you for the money or report this to the police; the authorities would then consider the circumstances and decide if there is enough to bring charges, possibly after some additional investigation.
Rate This Answer:
The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you go to AttorneyPages.com
and retain an attorney to represent you.