Is it malpractice if an organ that supposed to have been removed, wasn't?

Question Details: I have been dealing with a pain in my right abdomen for almost a year. We was in the process of changing insurances so I could not go to the hospital/doctor. After having a car accident and the pain intensified I went to the ER, I was later sent for a MRI that said possibly left cyst on ovary. I explained to the doctor that was impossible due to the fact that both my ovaries was removed 15 months ago. I went to my ob/gyn this doctor who did the surgery and through ultrasound revealed that I don't have my ovaries. He said, "You are okay". I went to another doctor for my well woman's exam and told her of my pain and she had an ultrasound done and she said I still have both my ovaries and that I have two cyst on my left and possible one on my right. She sent me for an MRI of the pelvis with and without contrast. The left ovary has a cyst. I go back to the first doctor who did my surgery and after doing another ultrasound he said yes both your ovaries are there and you have 2 cyst on the left and adhesion on the right. I got the ultrasound report that he did when he said my ovaries was not there and it reported that they was there at that time 4 months ago. He said, we must do the surgery and wants me to come in Tuesday for the operation. I have missed days of work due to the pain and even went down to part-time so that I would get terminated for missing so many days. I have to have this surgery over again. Every time I have surgery I get pulmonary embolism and have to give my self blood thinner shots for 6 weeks. Do Ihave the right to sue the doctor that did the first procedure? Should I speak with an attorney?

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you go to and retain an attorney to represent you.